ThroughloopThroughloop
The system that runs engineering teams

Turn this on, and your sprint runs itself.

Throughloop decides what your team should build, assigns work, fixes bottlenecks, and resolves incidents — autonomously, with guardrails. Prevents costly engineering mistakes before they happen.

Read-only by defaultHuman approval for external actions
throughloop · live agent
Agent active
Priority drift detected · impact 0.91
decision layer
Sprint focus
Dashboard polish
38% capacity · ENG-47, ENG-53
Customer reality
Payment reliability
78% of complaints (↑) · severity HIGH
Execution-layer signal
PR review time up 42% — 7 PRs over SLA
Avg wait
31h
Health
62
Alignment
41
Throughloop will
  • Reassign PR #202 → Noor
  • Reprioritize ENG-42 payments → top
  • Refocus sprint to payments
  • Verify alignment 41 → 88
2 loops · 8 actions · ~30minRun demo
The problem

Most teams don’t fail because of slow PRs. They fail because they build the wrong things.

We don’t just fix execution. We fix direction. Throughloop is a decision layer and an execution layer — so engineering hours land on the work that actually moves the business.

  • Sprint over-indexes on UI polish
    Customers complain about payments. The team ships dashboard tweaks.
  • Reviews stall
    PRs sit for days because the same 2 seniors carry the queue.
  • Engineers get blocked
    Junior engineers wait silently on senior bandwidth.
  • Direction discovered in retros
    By the time a leader sees the drift, two sprints are gone.
How it works

Two loops. One agent. End to end.

The decision loop catches what the team should be working on. The execution loop runs the fixes. Both close themselves.

Decision layer
Priority drift
loop 1 · what
  1. 1
    Read customer signals
    Support tickets, NPS, session replay, user research — frequency × severity.
  2. 2
    Compare to sprint capacity
    Where is the team actually spending hours? Is that what customers need?
  3. 3
    Reprioritize + reassign
    Move the right ticket to the top. Move the right engineer to the right area.
  4. 4
    Notify with reasoning
    Cross-team Slack post with the evidence, not just the verdict.
Execution layer
PR + sprint flow
loop 2 · how
  1. 1
    Watch the PR queue
    Detect drift the moment a review crosses your team's SLA.
  2. 2
    Find the long pole
    Identify the overloaded reviewer and the highest-impact stuck PR.
  3. 3
    Reassign + notify
    Route a backup reviewer, post context to #engineering, update the ticket.
  4. 4
    Verify recovery
    Re-check the metric. Escalate only if the fix didn't take.
Detect·Reason·Act·Verify
Live demo · two loops

First we fix execution. Then we fix direction.

Run the full demo end-to-end. Throughloop clears the PR bottleneck, then realizes the team is shipping the wrong thing — and realigns the sprint to what customers actually need.

Before
  • Avg PR review time31h
  • Engineering health62 / 100
  • Impact alignment41 / 100
  • Sprint focusDashboard polish
After
  • Avg PR review time11h
  • Engineering health92 / 100
  • Impact alignment88 / 100
  • Sprint focusPayments
Not a chatbot
A decision system.

Chatbots describe. Dashboards describe. Throughloop decides what the team should work on — and then does it.

Not a dashboard
An agent that closes loops.

Detect → reason → act → verify. We measure ourselves on alignment + bottlenecks resolved, not pageviews on a chart.

Replaces EM decisions
Direction + execution.

The work an engineering manager does between standups. We do it before standup, with reasoning attached.

Stop leaking shipping velocity.

See how Throughloop detects a PR bottleneck, runs the fix, and recovers your health score live.